106學年度全英語授課分享會紀錄
一、 全英語授課經驗分享
1. Tried this before. Generally speaking this is possible, but it depends on a lot of other factors... (time / text book / students' abilities... and so on)
2. 嚴格說來並非"全"英文，因為顧及學生理解及時間限制關係，課堂上仍須適時使用中文。所以，真正英文授課百分比約在 90-95%。英文授課時母語不應當被禁止或完全不使用。在英文授課課堂上，中文應當被視為教學的輔助工具。
3. 全英文授課若用在適當的能力的班級(如B1或以上)對於學生的英文聽力、語言使用、及學習意願是相當有助益的。英文授課班級的學生通常較願意嘗試用英文反應回答，學生們也覺得這樣的語言課較有挑戰性。
二、 全英語授課面臨之問題
1. Students' abilities vary, and their attention span tends to be rather limited. Furthermore, it could further hinder students' understanding when covering more difficult parts (e.g. grammar, background knowledge of literature...)
2. 全英文授課較適合的程度約在 B1，但並不是班上所有的同學都有B1的程度，所以對有些同學來說全英文授課相當吃力。
3. 上課時因為需要時常檢驗同學的理解，進度上稍微慢了一點。
三、 全英語授課接收到之正向回饋
1. Some students welcome it as a self-challenge / bridging opportunity to education abroad. Yet personally I'd assert that keeping English / Chinese around 80 /20 in class is perhaps a more feasible way to go for.
2. 增進英文聽力
3. 訓練英文思考
4. 訓練英文反應
5. 英文課比較有挑戰姓
四、 其他問題討論
1. If all English is what we are heading for, I'd suggest that our textbook needs to be more "interactive" and provide more up-to-date topics to interest students... While I do agree that the importance of reading ability cannot be over-emphasized, still I hear from time to time that students complain about our textbook as "boring" / "didactic" or "unrelated to real life." I should argue that these remain facts we need to face.
2. 是否可以請對於全英授課的利與弊有研究的教授來做相關議題的演講。
